Defectives : who are they?
Many in the "movement" play lip service to "excluding defectives" - but of course they never do it, giving said defectives pride of place within organizations, blogs, websites, comments threads, etc. One can define "defective" in such a way as to exclude even the worst "movement" misfits, and it is always "someone else" at "some other blog" or in "some other organization" who is the defective, never one of your own.
How then to effectively define "defective" in the context of racial nationalism?
A defective is someone whose ideas and/or behavior will repulse, alienate, and turn-off most White people independent of racial nationalism.
The last four words of the definition are crucially important. We acknowledge that just being pro-White is itself often enough to repulse many Whites and is enough to have one be considered "defective" by the mainstream. What I'm saying is let's eliminate that variable. Let's look at the person above and beyond their racial nationalism. Forget all about their pro-White activism. Is there anything else - anything independent of pro-White attitudes - that would make the person truly defective? That's the key. If we are pro-White, then that's a given and whether or not pro-White attitudes are considered "defective" by the mainstream is irrelevant, since we still need to promote pro-White memes. But that should not, and must not, be complicated by truly defective ideas and behaviors that have nothing directly to do with being pro-White.
