A Balancing of Accounts
I am
a pan-Europeanist who believes that people of European descent, of all ethnic
derivations, need to work together to pursue our common racial interests. I don’t ignore or overlook ethnic conflicts
between Europeans, but we need to get over the past and deal with the present
and look to the future.
However,
there are some with a constant ethnic axe to grind, who revel in promoting
intra-European conflicts, the same conflicts which, starting in August 1914,
has so thoroughly wrecked the White world.
A
common theme for such people is how White ethnics have damaged the interests of
WASPs/founding stock peoples in the Anglosphere. This can be considered a form of “White ethnic
guilt mongering.” Now, there is of course some truth in their complaints, as
ethnic conflicts have of course occurred between Whites and, in the past, there
may well have been serious conflicts of interests (note: in the past). What these people won’t admit though, is that
the conflict cut both ways and that the White ethnics were as much victims as
they were the victimizers.
The work of E.
Michael Jones is instructive in this regard; some reviews of that work are
excerpted below (emphasis added):
The
Slaughter of Cities provides a key to understanding who 'broke' America's
cities and why they did so. The book also indicates how the elites used World
Wars I and II to 'Americanize' Catholic ethnics, used the crisis of war
production to transport millions of poor
blacks North for factory work and housed them in Catholic neighborhoods,
branded Catholics as racists for resisting this influx…
…Rather,
from the 1950s on, a combination of misnamed redevelopment programs and malicious social planning turned these
areas into war zones, and finally, depopulated deserts. ... He insists that
what motivated such experiments as busing and scattered public housing,
presented as urban renewal, was at least partly a disdain for urban ethnics....
Protestant elites and their Jewish
liberal allies never hid their contempt for the white ethnics who resisted
their plans for thrusting underclass blacks into ethnic Catholic neighborhoods.
Nor did the urban reformers whom Jones examines, such as Louis Wirth and the
Blanshard brothers, conceal their intention of mainstreaming Catholic
immigrants and their descendants, whom they viewed as a threat to their notion
of a 'pluralistic America.' ... Jones correctly understands the overshadowing role of ethnic hatred in political life.
... Jones demonstrates that anti-Catholic
Protestants have also contributed to this manipulative revolution from above,
carried out in the name of fighting 'prejudice….
…Jones
documents, from a wide variety of government documents, essays and memoirs, the blood-boiling indictment that a
well-defined elite orchestrated federal housing policy to destroy the political
base of Polish, Italian, Irish and other ethnic Americans in the major,
industrial cities…
…the
cultural subversion practiced by America's elites, especially such seemingly
respectable institutions as the Ford and Rockefeller Foundations…
…the
application of private foundation and federal housing policies and dollars in
Boston, Chicago, Detroit and Philadelphia as a weapon of economic and political warfare…
Thus, WASPs and Jews together waged war on White
ethnics, using Blacks (and also Hispanics) as a biological weapon to destroy
White ethnic neighborhoods, wrecking America’s cities, and ruining the lives of
many millions of people. What could be worse than this – using Blacks/Hispanics
as weapons of biological warfare against other Whites? That weapon has proved more deadly than
nuclear bombs; compare Hiroshima and Nagasaki today with the pathetic ruins of
Detroit and Camden. And Jones’ analysis
is supported by Lind’s political
analysis, identifying a “Yankee”-Jewish-Black alliance aimed against both
White ethnics as well as White southerners.
