Assume the White Man has lost. What next?
Introduction: Hard
times are upon us. The type of invasion of Europe predicted in The Camp of the Saints is occurring today,
not in some distant future, and the pathologically altruistic response of weak,
deracinated Europeans is exactly as outlined in that novel. In Germany, the monstrous harridan Merkel is behaving
as an inverted anti-Hitler, presiding over the genocide of her own people. In
the UK, the sight of one dead Syrian child invokes an outpouring of
compassionate action that hundreds of sexually molested English children in
Rotherham failed to elicit. The navies of Italy and Greece are dedicated to
saving the invaders instead of repelling them, to facilitating the invasion
instead of stopping it. Mainstreaming nationalist Orban of Hungary makes
bombastic statements, while migrants riot in the streets of Budapest, and as
invaders make a mockery of his pathetically porous cheap chicken wire “razor
fence.” In France, mainstreaming heroine
Marine Le Pen is more concerned with denouncing her own father than in standing
as a new Joan of Arc against the invading hordes. Everywhere in Europe are the
sights and sounds of surrender, of a people so fecklessly reckless (or is it
recklessly feckless?) that they sacrifice their patrimony without the slightest
hint of resistance whatsoever. In America, the System has long ago given up
any pretense of guarding the border, and floods of illegal aliens join the
unending stream of “legal” immigrants. And
the only leading Presidential candidate who says otherwise is an abrasive
buffoon whose main concern is showing he does not wear a toupee, and who wants
a “big fat open door for legal immigrants.”
Facts are facts: majority-White nation states are doomed if the present trends continue. What could
come next? What should come next? What is the post-national future for a
stateless White race that will not have any majority-White nations to call
their own? What to do? How to survive? Is there a contingency plan?
There
are those who will not be happy with a discussion of such a scenario. The
“hard-core” “SuperHitler1488” types, sitting in front of their computers, with
a toothbrush moustache crudely hand drawn on their upper lips with black
marker, will rail against this “defeatism” and will proudly proclaim their
“willingness to fight” (after they watch the latest movie or football game);
the concern trolls will tell us all we need to do is follow Amren-style
mainstreaming for another quarter-century and all will be well; the “hate the
messenger” sweaty obsessives will object to the message primarily because I am
the one delivering it.
Nevertheless, this must be discussed. Contingency plans need to exist. A race considered
“superior” by some, with much commentary about “future time orientation” and
“planning and discipline” – you would expect the nationalist leadership of such
a race to be very seriously considering alternative future scenarios and how to
strategically prepare for, and deal with, each. Perhaps such planning is
occurring, somewhere hidden from the view of “small-fry” such as myself, who
dares not intrude upon the majestic thoughts of the mighty titans striding
across the racial nationalist landscape of today. If such planning is indeed
taking place, I applaud the initiative and wish it all the best. The problem is
that I really do not believe anything of the sort is taking place. The inept
“quota queens” of the “movement” are, I’m sure, mired in their foolishness and
fantasies, which is why, in fact, we are in the trouble that we face today. Decades of complete uselessness does indeed incur a
price on the inability of Whites to deal with the racial crisis.
Discussion: Therefore, imagine a scenario in which
the USA is majority non-White, many of the major nations of Western Europe are
majority non-White, other European nations are rapidly headed for similar
status, Whites are a subaltern minority in what used to be their nations and
homelands, a minority ruled by sneering aliens and step-and-fetchit White
traitors. The grand dream of a White resistance to “turn the tide before it is
too late” has failed to come to pass. The mainstreaming nationalists have
failed to cash in on their groveling slithering toward the political center.
The game is up and the White Man has lost. What then?
This
is hard to answer without knowing the details of the situation. Are Whites
still a plurality if not a majority? Are
all the non-White populations allied against the Whites? Do law and custom still allow some degree of
White resistance? Are there any
majority-White nations still in existence and what is their level of power and
their commitment to a racial resistance?
These questions, and many others, need to be considered as
possibilities. And, given how pathetically masochistic and delusional Whites
are, we need to ask if, even at that late date, with the failures of
multiculturalism on display for all to see, is there yet a significant fraction
of Whites who “buy into” racial nationalism and finally realize the folly of
pathological altruism?
Some
may invoke the ethnocentric model of cohesive Jewish Diaspora group
evolutionary strategies, as outlined in Kevin MacDonald’s works, as one
possible model to follow for Whites who find themselves effectively equivalent
to a stateless, diaspora people. There is much to say in favor of this, to an
extent, although I note that the large amount of admixture which occurred with
Jews at the beginning of their diaspora would be unacceptable for European
preservationism, although the later stress on endogamy of course is exemplary.
At the
risk of sounding like a broken record, I will suggest an approach based at
least in part on Codreanu’s Legionary movement. One could envision a pan-European, trans-national
movement, highly elite, comradely and collectivist in orientation, with an
emphasis on productive action, creating a higher form of man, with a defined
style of living. In a sense, this legion
would be analogous to some of the trans-national and pan-European crusading
orders of the past as well as recreating the best aspects of Codreanu’s
movement, adjusted for modern times (e.g., pan-European, rejecting universalist
ethos, etc.). All of the differences
between Codreanu’s movement and the failed racial nationalist “movement” of
today (particularly the American variant) that I discussed in my book review (linked to above) would be relevant here: all the best of Codreanu’s movement
would be embraced and all the flotsam and jetsam of contemporary racial and ethnic
nationalism would be absolutely eschewed. Such a movement would provide the
elite leadership to the stateless masses of the world-wide White minority,
guiding Whites through the dangers inherent in their status as a people without
any nation states of their own. Such a movement would help to bind Whites
worldwide in a brotherhood of solidarity – while of course absolutely rejecting
White traitors – and will draw a hard line against any miscegenation between
ethnic Europeans and those newcomers who have invaded White lands. With this
Legion at the head, Whites – or at least racially conscious Whites – would be
bound to each other through ties of race and culture and of a shared history, as
well as of shared problems and the shared sacrifices necessary for survival. While respecting and preserving the
distinctiveness that exists between different European groups, and honoring the
histories of the lost nations of Europe, this Legion and the masses it leads will absolutely reject the intra-European divisiveness that led the race and
civilization to their sorry state (and the sorry state we are in right now,
already, even before the final defeat).
Faced with existential threats to race and civilization, promotion of
retrograde blood feuds among Europeans would be considered treason or madness,
and treated as such (I would argue this should be applied today as well, and if
it was, perhaps the scenario discussed here would not have to occur at
all). Just as Codreanu’s movement aimed
at creating a new type of Romanian, the movement described here would aim at
creation of a new type of European, a change in mind, a change in attitude, a
change of spirit. In the fires of
defeat, a new type of White Man will be forged to deal with the dangers
of new realities, realities created by behavior that would be, finally, recognized
as defective and rejected. No more pathological altruism, no more surrender, no
more universalist ethos, no more groveling to the world of color while fighting
fellow Whites – no more stupidity and no more error. It will take a special
kind of elite to do these things, and that is what is proposed here.
Now,
of course, I believe we should be doing off of this this now, to prevent the fate of dispossession from occurring in the
first place. Indeed, I believe we should do this even in the event of a total White
racial victory, not only to prevent the racial crisis from ever happening
again, but also simply because it is the right thing to do, especially after
World Wars I and II. In the end, this
was the over-riding objective of the currently defunct Legion Europa project – a project which, in the last analysis, ran
afoul of the “movement’s” affirmative action program. Thanks, “movement.”
An aside: I must say this to those who champion
petty nationalism, who believe that narrow ethnic nationalism is the key to
survival: now is as good as time as
any to see your thesis demonstrated. Various European ethnies still have
control of their nation states, they are still the majority, and in certain
European nations, ethnic nationalist political parties exist. I suggest, I
urge, I implore for these ethnic nationalists to use the power of narrow ethnic
appeal to stop the invasion of Europe.
While that would not prove that ethnic nationalism is the way of the
future, and would not prove it superior to racial nationalism, it would at
least prove that ethnic nationalism has some
utility, that is has sufficient power to at least temporarily arrest the
demographic eclipse, the outright invasion, of the relevant narrow ethnies such
nationalisms are concerned with. The time to do that is now. If you cannot even
do that, if narrow petty nationalism cannot even motivate an ethny in the midst
of an existential crisis, then what good does it have at all?
Summary: If and when Europeans become
effectively stateless, when they loss control of all the institutions they have
built, then the only thing they will be able to depend upon will be each other.
The only thing that will ensure survival is each other. The only thing that can
hold out the promise of taking back, or creating, nation states for themselves,
is each other. It would be optimal to learn that lesson now, before the final
Fall of the West, but if the only way to learn is through the bitter experience
of total dispossession, so be it. If World Wars I and II were not sufficient
lessons, and apparently they were not, more painful and humiliating lessons are
just around the corner.
Conclusion: This essay is in no way meant as any
sort of comprehensive analysis of this question; it is instead merely meant to
“wake up” relevant individuals and groups to the necessity to ask the question
and come up with some answers. However,
in the process of doing so, I outline, in very broad terms, one possible
approach – the Legionary elite leadership approach - to consider as a
possibility in dealing with a post-national White future.
