A flawed argument.
I’m amused that on some racialist
websites, anti-racist commentators show up to promote the individualist idea
that since you are going to die anyway, why care about the future racial
make-up of the USA
or any other country? Why should it
concern you?
First, most people who are not
hyper-individualistic narcissistic sociopaths do care about posterity. People recycle, people care about the
environment, people worry about global warming – even if these issues involve
events that will take place after the concerned individuals die. It is normal human nature to at least care
about the future of our familial lineages, and Salter’s work makes clear the
analogy between family and ethny. It is
responsible stewardship of one’s biological and cultural patrimony to care
about the future of one’s people. Of
course, some feel differently. Salter
mentioned that “who cares?” will always be an essentially unanswerable riposte
to claims about group interests.
However, others do care – which raises another flaw in the “I don’t care
what happens after I die" argument.
The flaw in the “I don’t care
after I die” argument is – why then does pro-White advocacy bother the person
making the comment? After all, if the
hyper-individualists do not care what the racial situation is after they die,
and at the same time we do care, then why don’t the individualists leave us
alone to promote what we perceive to be our (group) interests while they can go
off and pursue whatever individual interests strike their fancy?
In other words, if Mr.
Individualist really doesn’t care about the racial future, then that person
should have no objection whatsoever to a future scenario in which White
nationalists are victorious and the European peoples thrive in homogeneous
homelands. Correct? Indeed, such an individualist really should
not object to a “Turner Diaries” scenario in which all non-Whites are
exterminated and only Whites are left to populate the Earth. Correct?
After all, if it happens after they die, and they won’t know about it,
no problem. Correct? A pro-White future should leave them as
unmoved and uncaring as an anti-White one.
Correct?
Actually – incorrect, because
these self-proclaimed individualists really do care about the racial future –
they want to see Whites disposed, mongrelized, and driven to extinction. This is why they become so hysterical about
pro-White activism even when they really shouldn’t care one way or the other
what the racial outcome is. Indeed, some
of these so-called “White individualists” may indeed be non-White themselves,
or married to a non-White, and therefore have a self-interested objective in
attacking White nationalist activism. In
other words, when they say “I don’t care” – they are lying. If not, I’d invite them to spend time
explaining to Jews, Blacks, Hispanics, and Asians why those groups should not
care about their group survival. After
all, Whites in general seem not to care and are going extinct. If the hyper-individualists care so much
about promoting their individualism, why focus on Whites? That’s essentially preaching to the choir –
after all, the White nationalists are a tiny and powerless fraction of the
White population. Collectivist racialism
is prominent among non-White groups, so it is there that the individualists
should concentrate their proselytizing efforts.
If they are sincere.
Which they’re not.
